FlackLife Reveals Foolish Astroturfing Campaign from Hunter College and Coach Handbags

Definition of astroturfing:

Astroturfing refers to marketing / public relations campaigns which attempt to create the impression of being spontaneous and true, genuine (and representations of *real* people and their opinions) when, in fact, they are not. In all of the standards of practice listed below, this practice is considered to be unethical.

Astroturfing is an interesting topic. I see PR practitioners that defend it as a valuable tool. Others decry it as unethical and bad practice. I’ll place myself in the latter group.

FlackLife blogger, Bob LeDrew, has the story in two posts so far. They are “Now we flacks get students to astroturf for us” and an interview with Hunter College faculty member and “PR expert Stuart Ewen on (the) ‘Heidi Cee’” astroturf blogging, social networks and YouTube video fiasco.

This example from Hunter College and Coach goes beyond simple astroturfing, though. This involves the following (Sources: here and here):

I simply cannot imagine a more definitive example of bad practice than this case. The interference by the president, the campaign tied to a donation to the college, the creation of a course solely to accomplish the deceit, the students (it seems) happily joining in, the faculty and department chair encouraging them along … it just boggles the mind. How stupid can these people be?

Read the links, watch the video. Fake vs. Fakes | Center for Media and Democracy. What do you think of all this? I’ve already seen two PR practitioners in a listserv group defend the practice. Oh, brother.

Update: Ya’ gotta read this great post by Clemson’s Dr. Mihaela Vorvoreanu. In particular, see the class blog she came across for the course. Yikes!

If you are interested, here is what I wrote in reply to the listserv group where the practice of astroturfing was being defended by a few PR practitioners.

The space known as social media is not the same as advertising.

The space has been claimed, for lack of a better term, by those that inhabit the space. The audience sets the rules and associations representing practitioners have recognized that reality by creating standards of practice guidelines.

In the Coach example, their target audience is young people. This further illustrates the irony and foolishness of the Coach astroturfing campaign. Younger audiences have an increasing disdain for advertising. Advertising, to younger audiences, is increasingly being perceived as fake and insincere.

Forget, for a moment, the social media kookaid drinkers and their “people formerly known as the audience” mentality. At its very core, the Coach example is bad practice.

Practitioners have seen fit to create guidelines that recognize these perceived lines in the sand created by the audiences inhabiting the space of social media.

The standard of good practice within the social media space says that it is the responsibility of communicators to (a) understand the space they are communicating in and (b) to be as completely transparent as they can be. This is why associations representing practitioners have seen fit to create standards of practice that call for that transparency.

Examples of those standards:

http://www.cipr.co.uk/socialmedia/ – Chartered Institute of Public Relations
http://www.womma.org/ethics/ – Word of Mouth Marketing Association — WOMMA

PRSA, IABC and IOAC have also established standards of practice.

In each, transparency is the common theme. The rules for advertising do not apply to social media. They are not the same thing. I realize that this concept is novel to many, but it is the reality in the social media space.

There is certainly “a disconnect in using an elaborately created fake person(s) to say that fake stuff is bad.”


0 thoughts on “FlackLife Reveals Foolish Astroturfing Campaign from Hunter College and Coach Handbags

  1. Martin

    This is nothing new, unfortunately. It’s just a college version of what corporate donors have been doing in grammar schools for years… the best example of which is:

    The maker of Prego spaghetti sauce donated money to grade schools in exchange for adding a lesson on “viscosity” to its curriculum in which Prego and Rago speghetti sauces are poured through a strainer… the correct interpretation of the lesson is that Prego is thicker… more “viscous.” Hence better. Dovetailing nicely with the company’s marketing campaign.

    Astroturfing is better because it’s thickerer!!… (As are Hunter’s president and faculty.)

  2. Emma Bell

    What’s new about this is that it was imposed from above by the president of the college, and implemented by a department chair who seems a little dense when it comes to the purpose of universities in a free society.

  3. Pingback: PR Connections » Triple astroturfing cheeseburger

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s